"Stories written in the first-person can temporarily transform the way
readers view the world, themselves and other social groups."
Ever wondered how movies and books drag you in? How you emotionally connect with villains, such as Loki, Saint Dane, or Voldemort, when in real life you wouldn't kick a kitten? Researchers from Ohio State University have been looking at "experience-taking," or what readers get out of books. The idea is to make readers think outside of themselves and literally become someone else, so that they can share experiences and look outside of their own life to understand other people's lives. This article doesn't promise all of the answers for how and why we fall in love with certain characters, but it's certainly going to start up the Michigan/Ohio State rivalry.
Go State!
What Are You Reading?!?!
I read everything.
Books in foreign languages, non-fiction, manga, autobiography, controversial, and whatever it is that Faulkner writes.
I read banned books.
Sometimes I think I should switch to Harlequin.
But that would be too easy.
This is a record of what I am reading and thinking. I do not promise to be anything less than myself.
Monday, May 21, 2012
Losing Sight of the Original Idea: Pam Bachorz's "Drought."
My first grievance with this week’s book was that I
totally did not understand the plot line. From the title, Drought, I got it
into my head that I was going to read about a world where there was no rain,
and that the main characters foraged for it. This is not the case. And by the
time I wrapped my head around the real
plot—that this is a book about a religious cult starring a girl whose blood can
heal wounds and grant you almost-eternal life—the author’s subplot careened off
course and became the main plot line.
Since 1812, this Congregation has been living in the
Adirondack foothills, scavenging for water. Before 1812, a woman named Sula met
a man named Otto, whose blood had magical qualities. Sula fell in love with
Otto, and the two formed a religion of sorts, gathering in believers. Of
course, America in1812 was not tolerant of Otto’s claims to fame. Otto runs
away, leaving his Congregation, and a pregnant Sula, behind.
When Ruby is born, a man named Darwin West has
virtually enslaved the Congregation, forcing them to collect water, which he
believes holds the key to immortal life. It is, although no one knows it but
Sula and the Elder’s, Ruby’s blood that gives the Water its life-giving
qualities.
And then one day, an Overseer comes to monitor the
Congregation. Unlike the other Overseers, he is kind, and gentle, and very
attractive to Ruby…
This was not the book that was advertised, and not
the book that I believe the author, Pam Bachorz, wanted to write.
To put what I mean into perspective, we need to take
a quick look at Pam Bachorz’s other book, Candor.
Candor
is
a place where everyone is brainwashed with mind messages, and the main
character, Oscar, manages to find a way to negate them. Oscar even manages to
make some profit rescuing teenagers from the subliminal messages and getting
them out of Florida. However, his life is turned upside down when a girl shows
up in the city of Candor…
The common thread between both books is brainwashing. Ruby, the main character
in Drought, is brainwashed into believing that her Congregation’s Christ-like
figure will come back and rescue her people from slavery. Ford, her lover, is
brainwashed into thinking that Jesus is the only person whose blood has
supernatural entities. They’re all brainwashed, the same way that Candor was
brainwashed into following subliminal messages. These are books about power,
these are books about control, and these are books on how your mind can be a
prison.
However, you have a very hard time guessing that.
Everything needed to make this book good is there.
Sula is abusive towards her daughter, seeing her as less holy than Otto, even
though they share the same blood, with the same qualities. Ruby is just a
commodity to Sula, whose blood will hold the Congregation until Otto can come
back and save them from Darwin West. Her mind is trapped by a dangerous belief,
that it is Otto who saves, and Otto who will return, and she is so convinced of
this she is willing to deny her own daughter.
An interesting parallel to this is Pam Bachorz’s
insistence on making Ford, Ruby’s lover, a Catholic. This is a detail that is
not necessary at all in the story. In fact, it’s downright annoying, to have a
love scene, followed by Ford asserting that only Christ’s blood is holy, and
Ruby is sinning, but oh, isn’t Ruby so sexy…?
With some tweaking, Bachorz could have made this an
interesting comparison. The Congregation believes Otto Saves, and Otto Will
Return. Christians believe that Christ saves, and Christ Will Return. What is
the difference between a Cult and a Religion? Is there a difference at all?
I kept waiting for Pam Bachorz to make these
connections, or even subtly make the reader connect the dots for herself, but
she didn’t. The only reason I caught this at all is because I myself am Roman
Catholic, and her portrayal of Ford as a Roman Catholic irked me (because he was doing it wrong!).
In fact, once Ford and Ruby start to get
romantically involved, the plot dies. All Ruby wants to do is run away with
him, at one point even abandoning her very sick mother to spend the night with
him at the movies. As the reader, I was appalled by Ruby’s behavior, and could
not understand how she could leave her mother.
Everything that this book could have been is
distorted by Ford and Ruby’s romantic entanglement. Ruby forsakes her
Congregation, herself, and her ideas to be with him, and the way Pam Bachorz
words it, Ruby appears to leave the Congregation more to be with Ford than to
look for Otto. By the way the book ends, I would guess Bachorz is planning a
sequel, but I have no idea how she is going to pull that off. The reader still
has no idea where Otto is hiding, and all I can imagine Ruby doing in the
outside world is eating and making love to Ford.
Ruby is in no way the strong character that Pam
Bachorz hoped for, and her writing left me very dissatisfied. She was unable to
tell the story she really wanted to tell, penning instead a watery, unsteady
version of the novel this could have been. This is the greatest disappointment
for me. When a writer is unable to write the story she meant to tell, that is a
sure sign that she has failed.
Saturday, May 5, 2012
Bookworms Taking Action
I recently read an interesting news article about a
group of women who live in West Vancouver, Canada. About eight years ago they
started a book club—and I applaud them for this—that met once a week. (The best
my life offers me is a writing group meeting once every month, and when my Pen
meetings roll around, I attack them as if I’ve been lost in the Sahara for a
year without water or books to read and I have finally been offered a gourmet
feast of pepperoni pizza and retellings of Greek legends. That is to say, I
live for them.)
This book club wasn’t like most books clubs I’ve
heard about, either. Instead of focusing on Jane Austen or classics or getting
into 50 Shades of Grey, they read books about empowerment. About civil rights
and social justice. And they started to react to what it was they were reading.
These women started to volunteer abroad and at home. And still they wondered, Are we doing enough?
Then they read Sheryl WuDunn and Nicholas Kristof’s
book, Half the Sky.
I had to read Half
the Sky for class, as well as write a book review on it, and as a college student,
it did not hit me as much as it did for these women. Even though I love and
respect Kristof and his writings, and as a female these issues are very important
to me, this book did not make me happy. Instead, it made me learn more than I
ever really wanted to know about C-Sections, and how in Africa it is apparently
normal for your doctor to pull out your uterus, like a huge bubble-gum bubble,
and cut it open to extract the baby.
Not what your average girl needs to be learning
about. I think my next book will be entitled: Abstinence, Forever.
But I realize I am basically disparaging this book, and not giving it
credit where it is due.
Here’s the thing: everything in Half the Sky is true and deeply impacting. When these women read
it, they knew that what Kristof and WuDunn were trying to say did not end on
the last page. So they held an event, raffling off goods such as a Cameron Diaz’
outfit, to raise money for and speak out against trafficking and domestic
abuse.
I applaud these ladies. They are amazing role
models, and really care about the people who live on this planet. They did
exactly what I wished I could have done after reading Half the Sky, and I commend them for it. They took their vision and
made it a reality.
The next step is to get the word out about women’s
empowerment and how YOU can help. Read the article. Read Kristof and WuDunn’s
book. And tell your friends, too. We all can’t do what the “Real Housewives of
West Vancouver,” did, but we can at least spread the word.
Some links (and books!) I recommend:
http://www.halftheskymovement.org/ This webpage is due to officially open...basically, any given second this month. It's an expansion of the book, and as a bonus, it will send you e-mail uploads!
http://www.unicef.org/ the website of a United Nations group that works on promoting education and health to children all over the world.
http://www.girlup.org/
Girl Up is one of my favorite organizations out there. It's bright, it's catchy, it has a clothes line, it does everything your average kind of selfish college student really likes. They also upload music videos and take your e-mail address, for information on the go.
http://www.invisiblechildren.com/
I'm sure you've heard about all of the Invisible Children controversy that has been floating around there. Yes, Jason Russell acted like an asshat and put his case in the toilet. But I for one have been following the Jason Russell saga for a very long time--and my friends have been keeping up with him since his first horrifying documentary. He has a lot to say, and it would be a shame to count his company out because their leader had a Human Moment.
Caroline Moorhead's book, Human Cargo: A Journey Among Refugees, that looks at why people are forced to leave their homes. This is more of a social aspect that women's empowerment, but it gives the same effect--we are all human, and deserve to be treated with basic dignity and rights.
Ayaan Hirsi Ali's Infidel. While this book is controversial for attacking the Islamic faith, this book does--I believe accurately--portray female genital cutting/mutilation and other hardships women face in Somalia and poorer regions of the world.
Jean P. Sasson's book, Princess, which also takes a look at women's rights in Saudi Arabia.
And if none of these books are enough, your normal philosophers and Saul Alinsky will guide you further in your quest for equality and empowerment. May the odds be ever in your favor.
Thursday, May 3, 2012
Short Story Month
So May is Short Story Month, and I have compiled a
list of some of my favorite short stories for you to enjoy. I have not
included novellas. Novellas are a different month entirely. (Okay, not
really. That is a complete lie. But there should be. Novellas are amazing but
nobody gives them enough credit. But that is a rant for ANOTHER DAY!)
Tales
for Stormy Nights
Let’s start off with ONE OF MY MOST FAVORITE
AUTHORS, EVER. Ever. His name is Oscar
Wilde. The short “etching” is called “A Sphinx Without a Secret.” It is
both highly satirical and deeply accurate.
“A Rose For Emily,” by William Faulkner, is good to give you the willies. Faulkner is
generally very confusing (anyone who has tried to read “As I Lay Dying,” will
know this) primarily because of his skill is juggling upwards of thirteen
characters. “A Rose For Emily,” is blissfully easy to read, but harder to wrap
your brain around.
While we’re still on the subject of WILLIES, it
would never do to ignore Edgar Allan Poe.
He has written numerous favorites of mine, such as “The Masque of the RedDeath,” “Cask of Amontillado,” “The Tell-Tale Heart,” “The Fall of the House ofUsher,” and “The Black Cat.” If Faulker can’t get you freaked out, Poe can.
Of course, Poe has written more than just scary
stories. As I recall, he has written several “satirical,” portraits as well.
But they’re not as fun to read, and I find it hard to believe Poe was really enjoying
himself while writing them.
“The Legend of Sleepy Hollow,” by Irving, is a classic American scary
story. It’s not as scary as some of the modern movies, but hey. The originals
are always best, right?
Here’s my last creeper: “The Yellow Wallpaper,” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman. Ladies, it
can get worse after the baby is already out; this story testifies to it. But it’s
not just a horror story for women. Men too can quake at how one woman undergoes
a mental breakdown.
The
Dystopian Craze
Kurt
Vonnegut, Jr’s “Harrison Bergeron,” follows in my new
favorite trend: dystopias. Many of you have probably read it in one or another
high school English course. Try reading it again. It’s better than my 11th
grade teacher gave it credit for.
Still on the dystopia subject, Ursula LeGuin is not just famous for her fantasies and science
fictions. She wrote, “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas,” a highly intriguing
look at the cost of a truly Utopian society. (Leading me to the question: Is there such a thing as a Utopia?)
And, of course, no dystopian selection is complete
without “The Lottery,” by Shirley Jackson.
Women
Writing for Women
Do we have any feminists in the house? Then Kate Chopin’s “Story of an Hour,” is a
must read. Short and deep, it’s another short story that most of you have
probably read in high school. Go back to it. Read it aloud. Let the words sink
over you. It’s just the story of an hour—and hearts can be won and lost so
quickly in that short span of time.
War
Stories
“An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge,” is probably one
of my favorites. It’s by a Civil war journalist named Ambrose Pierce, who went missing in Mexico at the age of 71.
Pierce just reminded me of Tim O’Brien, and “The Things They Carried.” It’s another war story,
from a different era.
Romances
Bringing up Oscar
Wilde again, “The Nightingale and the Rose,” is one of the saddest and
sweetest (and most depressing…wait…isn’t ‘saddest’ just a euphemism for ‘depressing’?)
stories EVER. And I mean EVER. I’m still crying about it years after reading
it.
And while I have never read this one myself, “Brokeback
Mountain,” was apparently once a short story by Annie Proulx.
Classics
Joyce.
“Dubliners.” More need not be said.
Bringing up Irving
again, “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow,” and “Rip Van Winkle,” cannot be
underestimated. America has so few folk legends of their own; we owe Irving.
Big time. Therefore I must urge you: READ HIS STUFF.
I hope that I've given you some short story ideas. Feel free to comment with short stories of your own--I realize that my "Romance" and "Women's Lit" sections are a little on the undernourished side.
HAVE A WONDERFUL MAY--AND READ A SHORT STORY!
Battle Hymn of the Not-Quite-So-Vicious Mother
This week I finally got around to reading Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother, by Amy
Chua. It seems to me that everyone has been regressing to their chimpanzee
roots over this book, especially because my (secretly evil) Japanese professor created
a class especially to compare Western and Eastern cultures, using Chua’s story
as the textbook, and my amazingly wonderful perfect Writing professor gave us
about three New York Times and Times articles to read that picked this book to death.
Personally, I don’t see what the big deal is.
Yes, Chua threatened to burn all of her daughter’s
stuffed animals. And yes, she frequently acted like an ostentatious asshat.
However
is there really a parent out there who has never threatened
to throw away all of their children’s toys? My mother certainly threatened me
with that time and time again.
“If
you don’t clean your room I will break out the garbage bags and you can say
GOOD-BYE TO ALL OF YOUR STUFFED ANIMALS.”
My mother would say this kind of thing to me all the
time. I was also eerily reminded of my childhood in this particular scene:
“I need a haircut,” Lulu said one day.
I replied, “After you spoke to me so rudely…you
expect me to get in the car now and drive you where you want?”
“Why do I have to bargain for everything?” Lulu
asked bitterly.
That night…Lulu locked herself in her room. Much
later…I went to see her and found her sitting calmly on her bed.
Lulu had taken a pair of scissors and cut her own
hair.
My mother used my hair as a threat, too. “If you
don’t put your dishes away I’M CUTTING YOUR HAIR.”
I was always particularly vain about my hair, which
hung around my hips for most of my life. For me, this was a threat. For Lulu,
it was a dare.
For the most part, I was less exasperated with Chua’s
parenting style and more annoyed at calling it the “Chinese style.” While in
the beginning she acknowledged that she has seen Westerners act like Chinese
parents, I still have no real idea of where she came up with her model. Her own
parents and siblings often tell her to shut the hell up, and if Chua refuses to
listen to the wisdom of her own parents,
who are immigrants, and therefore profoundly Chinese (maybe even more than she is!), then I wonder how
she can call this system anything but “The Amy Chua Perfectionist System.”
However, we know from the very beginning of the book
that Chua is going to change her tune—at least a little bit. The subtitle of Tiger Mother reads, How I was humbled by a thirteen-year-old. It is obvious by page one
that no matter what you think of Amy Chua’s parenting system, karma is coming
for her.
Despite karma and controversy, Chua does have a
point with Battle Hymn of the Tiger
Mother. American parents are letting their children get out of hand. While
Chua does not answer this problem with a definitive or even acceptable solution
for how to parent in the 21st century, she at least addresses the
issue. American parents are trying too hard to be their child’s friend, or
worse, spending too much time on themselves and completely ignoring their
child.
Chua writes how sometimes she longed to jet off to
California with her girlfriends for a spa weekend, but she knew her children
must always come first. This is an admirable attitude, if a little out of
proportion. Having children should not have to equal the death of the self.
This is where parenting can get tricky.
If you look at the grade school kids in America
today, they are rebellious, disobedient, and uneducated. This is the fault of
the parents who fail to instill in their children courtesy, proper respect, and
a love of education. By caring too much or too little, these children grow up
as spoiled rotten brats—and who knows what they will do when they’re grown up?
What I admired most about Chua was how she was not
afraid to be hated by them
or take the blame. She did what she felt was best for them—even if she took it
too far. And I think that it is important to remember that although verbally she was abusive, she was never physically abusive towards either of her daughters. Not once in the book does she mention doing more than spanking the child, and when she tried to kick her youngest daughter Lulu out of the house in the middle of winter, she immediately recoiled and coaxed her daughter back inside, where she got a warm bath and a cup of hot chocolate.
And as for all of the shouting, look where it got Sophia and Lulu--Sophia went to Carnegie Hall to perform, and their parents took them all over the world. I wish that someone had taken me to Saint Petersburg when I was younger.
Parents should be more willing to take the risk of being hated by
their child if it means they will grow up to be a good person and admirable
citizen--(or, to use my mother's words, "well rounded"). Chua’s daughters are shown to be generally very respectful,
well-educated, and dedicated, which would show that Chua is not wrong for
persisting in her unique parenting techniques.
My mother has done things I wish she hadn’t, and we
have had battles I wish we would not have. But never for one second did I
entertain the notion that she was doing these things to hurt me, or because she
did not love me. Lulu and Sophia, Chua’s children, seem to share this sentiment.
Was Chua frequently out of line? YES.
Is she ostentatious and self-glorifying? YES.
Is she completely wrong here?
I would have to answer that with an I don’t think so.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)


